Mainichi interview with Bill Emmott: How to view the Koizumi legacy?

October 6, 2008
By Ken Worsley


Former Economist editor Bill Emmott recently sat down for an interview with the Mainichi Shimbun, and his comments on the Koizumi administration are very good:

I think that it’s right to criticize some part of Koizumi’s reforms for causing this increasing income gap, because the Labor Law reform that his government introduced is directly responsible for this widening gap between rich and poor by creating the conditions under which 30 percent of the labor force are in part time or temporary employment, with much lower benefits. So I think that a new government needs to find a way to change Japan’s Labor Law and remove this incentive for cheap labor and employment and to equalize the rights for all types of workers: full time, part time, contract … there’s no justification for having different rights for different types of workers.

Absolutely!

Koizumi’s Labor Law reform was not a piece of market fundamentalism or a free market-type reform. It’s not included in the market textbook that you should establish a two-tier labor market and strip away protection from one part of the force. So I think that it’s right to criticize the Koizumi administration for that, but it’s not right to say there should be no market-based reform.

Of course, reforms to the labor laws began before Koizumi’s administration, but the income gap became much more notable under his watch. Long term, the question is how this will affect how Koizumi is viewed. Shorter term, can better reforms be put in place in order to equalize the legal status of Japan’s workforce? (I’m not 100% sure about the word ‘rights’ here, but that’s more philosophical/legal hair-splitting rather than practical/economic.)

At any rate, the full interview is here.

Comments

5 Responses to “Mainichi interview with Bill Emmott: How to view the Koizumi legacy?”

  1. osker on October 24th, 2008 1:03 pm

    On “legal status” versus “rights”:

    Shorter term, can better reforms be put in place in order to equalize the legal status of Japan’s workforce? (I’m not 100% sure about the word ‘rights’ here, but that’s more philosophical/legal hair-splitting rather than practical/economic.)

    Is it really? Is not having the same legal status amongst workers an inherent right?

  2. Ken Worsley on October 24th, 2008 5:20 pm

    Osker,

    If it were an inherent right, then current laws would be in violation of that right. I don’t think that the legal status of workers is an inherent right at all - where would it come from? It certainly does not follow a priori. Legal protections for workers are rights granted by a government, and I don’t see how they could transcend the written law (unless you bring courts in certain countries into the equation).

    Still, I don’t think it really matters. It is in Japan’s interest to equalize the legal status of these workers, no matter whether it’s a question of rights or not.

  3. osker on October 24th, 2008 8:39 pm

    Aren’t rights inherent in human beings at birth?

  4. Ken Worsley on October 24th, 2008 9:56 pm

    Osker,

    What rights? And who grants them?

  5. fibogann on October 27th, 2008 1:40 pm

    The 2004 reforms really pushed more people into temp work, since it could then apply to almost any industry. The AP put out something on it today:
    http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5g95uthQvsJvcgNIJ3ZFMs8PGBjxgD9428OU00

    What gets me is don’t these workers understand that they’re being shafted by their own government?

Got something to say?